SELECT WHERE YOU WANT TO BEGIN FROM THE MENU

THIS SITE explains my approach to the problem and tells you something about me

FIRST STEPS contains an essay on multifactorial epidemiology and two exploratory papers to support the views in the essay

SYNOPSIS outlines the hypothesis underlying my work and discusses the extent to which the current edition of the site addresses it

CONTACT lets you tell me what you think of my ideas so far. You can, if you wish, heap praise or scorn

COMING SOON
A short scientific history of smoking and health, outlining how the conventional wisdom on smoking and health arose and some of the awkward questions left lying along the way


There is abundant evidence from observational epidemiology that smokers tend to suffer from certain diseases more frequently than do non smokers. There remains, however, an important question.

Why?

It may seem surprising after more than half a century of research that it is necessary, or possible, to ask this question, but after deliberating on the question for more than half of that period, I still do.  What's more, the answers I get are neither clear nor simple.

Poor ignorant fool, you may say.

Poor I may be, but I do not think that I am especially ignorant or foolish.

Join me in this website as I suggest that the difficulty arises from regarding risk factors such as smoking as simple, independent entities. We need a multifactorial approach to epidemiology which can also bring toxicology, physiology and molecular biology into the story

This is a scientific website.   If you want a story about bad people and conspiracy, look elsewhere, but if you like a good scientific quest, stick with me.   The story is written in scientific language but do not be deterred if you are not a scientist. As far as possible, I will make it intelligible to the layperson.